Holy Smoke! Could Holder possibly get any more ARROGANT?

by TankerHC on Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:28 am

First he is clearly lying to Congress as he had the memo's months before F&F became public knowledge, and Congress knows it. Then during testimony he actually has the cajone's to do this "used the occasion to prod Congress to support efforts to give the department broader legal tools to track firearms purchases.". He is UNDER INVESTIGATION and wants MORE GUN CONTROL as a result. Bejeebus. Whats up with these Liberal Democraps?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/08/holder-suggests-fast-and-furious-guns-will-be-used-in-crimes-for-years-to-come/

by Doug Bowser on Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:36 am

They instituted F&F to show more need for gun control. There was a propaganda campaign about guns going to Mexico before F&F was started. It is obvious. If it were not for the BATFE whistleblowers, it would have worked. The DemocRATS said that 90% of the firearms used in crimes in Mexico were imported illegally from the USA. The fact was 90% of the firearms used in crimes in Mexico and were traceable were from the USA. Almost all the firearms used in crimes in Mexico, had no serial numbers and were not traceable. I remember Obummer cowing down to the President of Mexico on the subject, in a Rose garden press conference. I would have thrown the bum out of the Rose Garden, if I were President of the USA.

Doug

by SilentHitz on Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:55 am

That's not bold...it's arrogant! But that seems to be the style of this administration. +1 @Doug...they got caught with their hand in the toilet.

by pinetor on Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:11 am

http://news.yahoo.com/holder-faces-heat-bungled-gun-sting-124000339.html

dern still late to the show.

So this report does acknoledge that gun-owners see this as an attack on the 2nd Ammendment, not sure if they liked reporting that though.

by TankerHC on Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:53 pm

SilentHitz wrote:That's not bold...it's arrogant! But that seems to be the style of this administration. +1 @Doug...they got caught with their hand in the toilet.

Arrogant was actually the word I was looking for, but couldn't remember. lol

by **captain-03** on Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:56 pm

... and he testified that he still does not know the PERSON or PERSONS who gave the final authorization ..... seems that would be a easy thing to determine. Just start and the top and work your way down!! A few telephones call should do it!!

They know!!

Holy Smoke! Could Holder possibly get any more ARROGANT?

Holy Smoke! Could Holder possibly get any more ARROGANT?

Re: Holy Smoke! Could Holder possibly get any more ARROGANT?

Re: Holy Smoke! Could Holder possibly get any more ARROGANT?

Re: Holy Smoke! Could Holder possibly get any more ARROGANT?

Re: Holy Smoke! Could Holder possibly get any more ARROGANT?

Re: Holy Smoke! Could Holder possibly get any more ARROGANT?