Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by TankerHC on Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:46 pm

Well, this had popped up on Facebook today and first thing I thought was "Yea, right" Scotus is going to bring a case that could end up with Obama's impeachment and overturn the Election Results. BS. And sure enough, there are all sorts of websites claiming its a fraud (All these websites are Liberal, like "The Truth About Obama site". Well, there is only one problem. Its ON THE supremecourt.gov website, AND ITS TRUE.

Here is the original post followed by the link to the SCOTUS Website. Chief Justice Kennedy felt there is enough evidence to bring it before the full court.

Press release!

Law offices of Orly Taitz

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

Please, keep in mind, Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in, but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. over 30 high ranking officials of Nixon administration including Attorney General of the United States and White HouseCcounsel were indicted, convicted and went to prison. ObamaForgery gate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a citizen of Kenya Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social security number.

Here is the SCOTUS Website Link

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

Here is the law offices of Orly Taitz Website making the announcement.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=375765

Yes this will probably be moved to Round Table, but isnt important enough that EVERYONE SEE IT? This is no small thing.

TankerHC
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Posts: 6519
Join date: 2010-07-26
Age: 51

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by mhead on Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:06 pm

I can't research the links right now but. . . .I am Skeptical.

mhead
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 1609
Join date: 2009-08-05
Age: 34
Location: Brandon

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by RDRJR on Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:06 pm

Something to watch.

RDRJR
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 649
Join date: 2009-04-20
Age: 38
Location: Jayess

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by TankerHC on Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:10 pm

mhead wrote:I can't research the links right now but. . . .I am Skeptical.

Nothing really to be skeptical about. Its right on the Supreme Courts website on the docket with other cases coming up in February, how they rule will be one thing. But that it is coming before the SCOTUS there is no doubt.

BTW, I searched the SCOTUS docket for this guy. He Change that to (SHE) (Orly Taitz) is one of the Attorneys who got the Defense of Marriage Act enacted and got Proposition 8 through the Supreme Court defining marriage as between a Man and a Woman in California.

TankerHC
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Posts: 6519
Join date: 2010-07-26
Age: 51

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by highpowered9 on Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:17 pm

Maybe there is hope for this country after all?

highpowered9
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 705
Join date: 2012-06-21
Age: 58
Location: Louisville

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by scottyp on Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:17 pm

I followed the links and unless its some kind of elaborate hoax it looks legit to me. Also if this gets moved to the round table please tell me how to ask so I can participate.

scottyp
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 736
Join date: 2011-12-09
Age: 48
Location: Warren Co.

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by TankerHC on Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:26 pm

scottyp wrote:I followed the links and unless its some kind of elaborate hoax it looks legit to me. Also if this gets moved to the round table please tell me how to ask so I can participate.

Its no Hoax, I was thinking the same thing, possibly a very elaborate hoax. But the problem with that is you can just go to the SCOTUS website and search yourself, then you can search the docket and see that yes, Taitz has failed several times in front of the SCOTUS, but he also has some big victories. He SHE is no amateur. And you can also just check out his HER Law Office website, its there.

TankerHC
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Posts: 6519
Join date: 2010-07-26
Age: 51

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by BobKat on Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:43 pm

sitting back watching intently... Smile

BobKat
Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster

Posts: 355
Join date: 2010-01-16
Location: Desoto County

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by TankerHC on Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:14 pm

One thing to note. This is going to Conference, not to trial (Yet), plenty of cases are brought before the Court in Conference that are denied to be heard. But here is the difference. In most cases that come to Conference, the cases are distributed, each Justice gets 1/8th of the cases and they are read by the clerks and either thrown out or brought before the Court. In this case Roberts has decided the case will be heard by the full Court in Conference.

I have been reading Orly Taitz responses to questions. She says she needs four Justices to say yes and it goes in front of the Court. She apparently believes Scalia and Alito will side with her, she believe Roberts will as well since he is the one who allowed it to go to Conference in front of the full Court. That means she needs one Justice. Since Sotomeyer and Kagan have a conflict of interest, they should recuse themselves, but wont (I dont believe they will).

Someone posed a good question. Will Scallia and Alito turn out to still be "The good guys" after this? Or will they fold like everyone else on everything.

TankerHC
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Posts: 6519
Join date: 2010-07-26
Age: 51

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Boudreaux on Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:43 pm

lets say it goes in front of the SCOTUS and is rulled in favor of, what happens?

Boudreaux
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 896
Join date: 2010-03-12
Age: 37
Location: Pearl River County

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Cfield on Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:11 pm

scalia, alito, roberts, thomas. four conservative justices......well, roberts.....i dunno. forget the ladies

Cfield
Established Poster
Established Poster

Posts: 95
Join date: 2012-12-16
Location: Laurel

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by scottyp on Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:21 pm

Boudreaux wrote:lets say it goes in front of the SCOTUS and is rulled in favor of, what happens?
You mean after the impeachment starts? RIOTS...

scottyp
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 736
Join date: 2011-12-09
Age: 48
Location: Warren Co.

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Guest on Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:31 pm

I wonder if Sotomayer and Kagan would recuse themselves due to a conflict of interest? If Orly Taitz won her case (assuming it goes that far), would Sotomayer and Kagan be unemployed or would the Congressional confirmation over ride Barry Soetoro's nomination and leave them on the bench?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by scottyp on Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:35 pm

marke wrote:I wonder if Sotomayer and Kagan would recuse themselves due to a conflict of interest? If Orly Taitz won her case (assuming it goes that far), would Sotomayer and Kagan be unemployed or would the Congressional confirmation over ride Barry Soetoro's nomination and leave them on the bench?
Now that is an interesting question. I wonder what the law says on this thinking

scottyp
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 736
Join date: 2011-12-09
Age: 48
Location: Warren Co.

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Rw on Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:49 pm

If this moves to the round table... please add me hammer

Rw
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 6548
Join date: 2010-03-11
Location: clinton

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Boudreaux on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:10 pm

scottyp wrote:
Boudreaux wrote:lets say it goes in front of the SCOTUS and is rulled in favor of, what happens?
You mean after the impeachment starts? RIOTS...

no doubt, but what about his appointments, and the laws he has signed? I know this is probably wishful thinking, but hey, a man can dream, can't he?

Boudreaux
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 896
Join date: 2010-03-12
Age: 37
Location: Pearl River County

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by 22lrfan on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:22 pm

If this came true we could be faced with two of the scariest words we've ever heard...

President Biden no

22lrfan
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 6289
Join date: 2010-08-31
Age: 55
Location: Rankin Co.

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by arnygollott3 on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:23 pm

I have no idea what the merits of this case are, if any. They might be legitimate or it may be complete speculation and myth.

However, one thing I can say without ANY DOUBT is that no matter what was discovered, NOTHING WILL COME OF IT. The SCOTUS will not 'disrupt' the populace in a way that this could potentially do. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, I am all for the process and cause, especially if they are dealing with good hard evidence of any kind, but nothing will see the light of day. The SCOTUS will not throw the country into turmoil, ESPECIALLY during these troublesome economic times.

arnygollott3
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 941
Join date: 2009-04-23
Location: D'Iberville

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Rw on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:23 pm

22lrfan wrote:If this came true we could be faced with two of the scariest words we've ever heard...

President Biden no


oooff, that would be bad. Almost as bad as pres hitlery

Rw
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 6548
Join date: 2010-03-11
Location: clinton

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by sand_man on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:27 pm

22lrfan wrote:If this came true we could be faced with two of the scariest words we've ever heard...

President Biden no

Hopefuly he will go down with the rest of them!

sand_man
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 6431
Join date: 2009-05-24
Age: 58
Location: Shipman

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Tree of Liberty on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:36 pm

This isn't an uphill battle...it is a ninety degree uphill angle battle....
Ms. Taitz beliefs include (via wikipedia):

Taitz has made other Obama-related claims, including:

- A number of homosexuals from Obama's former church have died mysteriously.
- Obama has dozens of Social Security numbers, and his passport is inaccurate. Taitz claims that a person who was cooperating with the FBI in connection with Obama's passport died mysteriously, "shot in the head".
- A Kenyan birth certificate with the name "Barack Obama" is authentic.
- Obama's first act as President was to donate money to Hamas, which she claims will be used to build Qassam rockets.
- Obama, or someone connected to him, has made threats to Taitz's life and vandalized her car.
- Obama is having the Federal Emergency Management Agency build internment camps for "Anti-Obama dissidents".
- Osama bin Laden was killed years ago, with his body kept on ice, and the announcement of his death was timed to divert attention from an upcoming court case she is litigating challenging Obama's citizenship.


AND

Taitz has also supported a number of other theories not directly related to Obama, including:

- Goldman Sachs runs the United States Treasury.
- Baxter International has developed a bird flu vaccine that kills people.
- Representative Alcee Hastings and the House of Representatives are planning to build at least six labor camps.
- Hugo Chávez owns the software that runs American voting machines.
- FactCheck is untrustworthy because of its links to the Annenberg Foundation.

Taitz has also advocated numerous Internet-related theories, including PayPal attacks, the deletion of her Wikipedia entry, and Google's flagging her webpage as an attack site and suppressing search results for her name.


holy sheep

Tree of Liberty
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 1914
Join date: 2011-09-08
Location: The Mountain

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by TankerHC on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:39 pm

[quote="Tree of Liberty"]This isn't an uphill battle...it is a ninety degree uphill angle battle....
Ms. Taitz beliefs include (via wiki):


Dont believe everything you read on wiki. I could go on their right now and change every one of those comments without reference (They would be pending).

There is only certain facts at the moment. Chief Justice Roberts is allowing her case to go to Conference. All of the things in Wiki are not being brought up in this case. She has been in front of the SCOTUS 31 times (ANd 30 times she has failed and was even fined once for $200,000). ANd finally, if 4 Judges believe this shows merit, it could very well end up in front of the Court.

TankerHC
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Posts: 6519
Join date: 2010-07-26
Age: 51

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Tree of Liberty on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:46 pm

[quote="TankerHC"]
Tree of Liberty wrote:This isn't an uphill battle...it is a ninety degree uphill angle battle....
Ms. Taitz beliefs include (via wiki):


Dont believe everything you read on wiki. I could go on their right now and change every one of those comments without reference (They would be pending).

There is only certain facts at the moment. Chief Justice Roberts is allowing her case to go to Conference. All of the things in Wiki are not being brought up in this case. She has been in front of the SCOTUS 31 times (ANd 30 times she has failed and was even fined once for $200,000). ANd finally, if 4 Judges believe this shows merit, it could very well end up in front of the Court.

I guess its time to buy a bottle of Tums....

I'm stunned they've allowed it to go to conference. Thanks for this find (SCOTUS site) Tank. I don't do Facefriends and haven't seen this being reported anywhere.

Tree of Liberty
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 1914
Join date: 2011-09-08
Location: The Mountain

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by davonwav on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:56 pm

Yea I'm with Scotty on the anticipated riots & maybe the worst ever seen. If it doesn't see the light of day, then SCOTUS & our beloved country is being held hostage by certain elements of society...and has been for some time. Yea KING 'O will continue to reign with a trillion dollar coin to handle the debt, full steam ahead to tear the country to pieces! I sure hope I'm wrong Tank!

davonwav
Established Poster
Established Poster

Posts: 104
Join date: 2011-05-17
Location: Hattiesburg, Ms.

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by scottyp on Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:58 pm

[quote="Tree of Liberty"]
TankerHC wrote:
Tree of Liberty wrote:This isn't an uphill battle...it is a ninety degree uphill angle battle....
Ms. Taitz beliefs include (via wiki):


Dont believe everything you read on wiki. I could go on their right now and change every one of those comments without reference (They would be pending).

There is only certain facts at the moment. Chief Justice Roberts is allowing her case to go to Conference. All of the things in Wiki are not being brought up in this case. She has been in front of the SCOTUS 31 times (ANd 30 times she has failed and was even fined once for $200,000). ANd finally, if 4 Judges believe this shows merit, it could very well end up in front of the Court.

I guess its time to buy a bottle of Tums....

I'm stunned they've allowed it to go to conference. Thanks for this find (SCOTUS site) Tank. I don't do Facefriends and haven't seen this being reported anywhere.
+1 on the tums.....and bourbon.....and prozac.....

scottyp
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 736
Join date: 2011-12-09
Age: 48
Location: Warren Co.

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Richard M on Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:02 am

So if this is true you think it will be better or worse under Biden?

Richard M
Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster

Posts: 321
Join date: 2011-06-02
Age: 60
Location: Pearl

Back to top Go down

Re: Cheif Justice Roberts - Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State (Very Important)

Post by Boudreaux on Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:36 am

If this comes to prove true, I would think Biden would be tied into it some how. If Obama isn't eligible to be president, then I would hope the entire election would be challenged.

Boudreaux
Distinguished Poster
Distinguished Poster

Posts: 896
Join date: 2010-03-12
Age: 37
Location: Pearl River County

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum